If you’re planning works near a shared wall or boundary, you’ll quickly come across two phrases that sound similar but are worlds apart in law and effect:
- “Party Wall Agreement” (a colloquial, private document)
- “Party Wall Award” (a statutory document under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996)
Mixing them up can cost you time, money, and legal protection. Here’s what you need to know.
The short version
- There is no such document in the Act called a “party wall agreement.”
- Party Wall etc. Act 1996
- A Party Wall Award does exist under the Act. It is a formal, legally binding determination prepared by appointed surveyor(s). Don’t be fooled into signing the wrong thing.
Why the wording matters
“Party Wall Agreement” (the risky one)
This is typically a home-brewed letter or side agreement between building owner and adjoining owner. It might look friendly and straightforward, but:
- It isn’t a statutory document under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.
- It won’t automatically import the Act’s procedures, evidential safeguards, or enforcement mechanisms.
- It can waive or muddle rights around access, working hours, methods, damage, and making good.
- If a dispute arises, you may lack a clear route to resolve it under the Act, because you never triggered the formal process that leads to an Award.
In short, by relying on a private “agreement,” you’re effectively contracting out of the Act’s framework, and with it the clarity, balance, and protections the statute provides.
Party Wall Award (the protective one)
A Party Wall Award is the only formal decision-making document the Act provides. Key points:
- It must be prepared by party wall surveyor surveyor(s) appointed under the Act.
- It records what work may proceed, how and when, plus protective measures, access arrangements, working hours, and who pays what.
- It typically includes or references a Schedule of Condition (a record of your neighbour’s property condition before works), making any later damage claims clearer and fairer.
- It is binding and enforceable, with rights of appeal strictly limited and time-bound.
“But can’t we just both agree and crack on?”
The Act allows an adjoining owner to consent to a properly served party wall notice. That’s legitimate—and still within the Act. What’s not legitimate is skipping the Act altogether and replacing it with a casual “agreement” document that isn’t an Award and isn’t issued by appointed surveyor(s).
If you want simplicity and protection, do it properly:
- Serve the correct notice(s) for your works.
- If your neighbour consents in writing to the notice, an Award may not be needed. Still, best practice is to take a Schedule of Condition to avoid later disputes about damage.
- If your neighbour dissents (or doesn’t respond), surveyor(s) are appointed and an Award is made. That’s the formal safety net.
The practical risks of the wrong document
- Insurance & liability gaps: Informal agreements rarely satisfy insurers or cover the real-world risk profile of structural works.
- No clear damage mechanism: Without a Schedule of Condition and Award procedures, causation and liability become arguments, not facts.
- Enforcement headaches: Private letters lack the Act’s enforceable status. If things go wrong, you’re into general civil litigation—slower, costlier.
- Neighbour relations: A transparent, surveyor-led Award protects both sides. A DIY agreement can feel one-sided or unclear, breeding mistrust.
How to spot you’re being offered the wrong thing
- The document is titled “Party Wall Agreement”, “Neighbour Agreement,” or similar—not “Award.”
- There’s no reference to surveyors appointed under the Act.
- There’s no Schedule of Condition of the neighbouring property.
- It doesn’t mention specific statutory notices, procedures, appeal periods, or the surveyor’s jurisdiction.
- It relies on vague “we agree to the works” wording with no detail on method, access, hours, protection measures, making good, or costs.
If you see these signs, pause and seek advice before signing.
A safe, simple pathway (checklist)
- Identify the notifiable works (cutting into the party wall, excavations near/below foundations, building on the line of junction, etc.).
- Serve valid notices with the required lead-in periods.
- Record a Schedule of Condition (even when your neighbour consents).
- If dissent/ no response: Appoint surveyor(s) and proceed to a Party Wall Award.
- Follow the Award during works; keep records and communication clear.
- Close out properly (any making good or agreed compensation).
Bottom line
- A “Party Wall Agreement” is not a legal instrument under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. Using one instead of the Act’s process is not protection—it’s exposure.
- A Party Wall Award is the real, lawful document under the Act and must be prepared by surveyor(s).
- Don’t be fooled into entering the wrong document. If you’re unsure, ask a qualified party wall surveyor to review your situation before you sign.
This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. If you need guidance on your specific project, consider speaking to a party wall surveyor or solicitor experienced in the Party Wall etc. Act 1996.
You said:
add a call to action at the end to Simple Survey
ChatGPT said:
Thought for 7s
Here’s a call to action you can drop in at the end:
Ready to do it properly? Try Simple Survey
Skip the guesswork and protect your project. Simple Survey will:
- Check if your works are notifiable under the Act
- Serve the correct notices on time
- Arrange a Schedule of Condition
- Prepare (or receive) a Party Wall Award via qualified surveyors
Take the safe route—book a Simple Survey today and get your works moving with confidence.