A Party Wall Award is best understood as the Act’s method of replacing uncertainty with a binding written outcome. Where neighbours consent in writing, an Award may not be required. Where there is dissent or non-response, the Act moves to a surveyor-led dispute resolution procedure under Section 10, and that process commonly concludes with an Award.
At Simple Survey, we regard Awards as practical documents with a simple purpose: they define what can be done, how it is to be done, and how certain responsibilities are allocated, so that works can proceed with confidence. They are not meant to be dramatic, and they are not meant to be inflated into a legal spectacle. When an Award becomes overcomplicated, it becomes expensive—both in professional time and in the indirect cost of delay.
The starting point is understanding when an Award is needed. If there is no written consent, the matter does not simply “go away”. The Act provides a structured route so that the parties are not left in limbo. Once the matter is in dispute (including a deemed dispute), Section 10 sets out the appointment routes: either one agreed surveyor for both owners, or separate surveyors for each owner who then select a third surveyor. These mechanics exist to ensure the outcome is reached even where neighbourly agreement is not immediately available.
A common myth is that a Party Wall Award is “the neighbour’s protection” and therefore inherently adversarial. In reality, an Award benefits the building owner as much as the adjoining owner because it creates a defined, lawful basis to proceed. It reduces argument and replaces it with a written framework. In commercial terms, that framework is often the difference between a controlled programme and a drifting programme.
So what makes an Award “good” in practice? We judge it by three criteria:
- Clarity: The works must be described with enough precision that both owners understand what is authorised. Vague phrasing is a recipe for ongoing arguments.
- Proportionality: The document should be as detailed as it needs to be, and no more. Over-documentation does not add safety; it adds cost.
- Programme realism: The Award should support the build sequence, not fight it. Unrealistic requirements create friction on site and trigger avoidable professional correspondence.
Another point homeowners overlook is that an Award is not a substitute for good project management. If contractors behave poorly, if communication becomes provocative, or if the programme is chaotic, an Award will not magically restore calm. What it does do is establish the framework within which issues can be handled properly, without relying on doorstep debates or informal pressure.
From our side, we keep Awards commercially sensible by focusing on what the Act requires and what the project genuinely needs. We avoid padding. We avoid argumentative drafting. We assume that both owners want the same thing in the end: for the works to be done properly, without unnecessary drama and without avoidable cost.
Finally, it is worth remembering that the Act is designed so that surveyors can administer resolution within the statutory framework, without the parties needing to treat every disagreement as a court battle. That is why proportionate Awards remain the most common and practical endpoint in ordinary residential disputes.
Get Cost Saving Pro Advice Now
If you want a Party Wall Award handled with clarity, restraint, and cost control, contact Simple Survey. Notices start from £25 per adjoining ownership, and agreed surveyor administration is typically £300, depending on complexity and owners.